- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 396
- Points
- 18
FYI: Cu = copper, Al = aluminum
I have a Cu heatsink that I could use that would be about 10-25% (I'm not a good estimator when it comes to cylindrical objects; it may not even be 10%, I'm really not sure) smaller than an available Al heatsink. I read a bit online about Cu vs. Al in CPU heatsinks. It said that Cu is better, but only worth the extra cost if there's 800 ft.^3 moving over the fins (which doesn't really apply to this application) and/or (it wasn't terribly specific) there's 25% or less of the surface area being used. (I'm not sure how I would apply that last one since there's multiple surfaces. It mentioned that Cu can be up to 3x more effective than Al. So, which would be better? A slightly smaller Cu heatsink, or a slightly larger Al heatsink?
Thanks!
-Bearded_Galaxy
I have a Cu heatsink that I could use that would be about 10-25% (I'm not a good estimator when it comes to cylindrical objects; it may not even be 10%, I'm really not sure) smaller than an available Al heatsink. I read a bit online about Cu vs. Al in CPU heatsinks. It said that Cu is better, but only worth the extra cost if there's 800 ft.^3 moving over the fins (which doesn't really apply to this application) and/or (it wasn't terribly specific) there's 25% or less of the surface area being used. (I'm not sure how I would apply that last one since there's multiple surfaces. It mentioned that Cu can be up to 3x more effective than Al. So, which would be better? A slightly smaller Cu heatsink, or a slightly larger Al heatsink?
Thanks!
-Bearded_Galaxy