Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Aixiz(3) Predator's sight....

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
yeah I was thinkin overkill myself with the antec stuff. That's why I recommended the clay. it's cheap and would be easy to remove if you ever needed to. You could also use JB weld it's grey but a little to dark. The neat thing is you can always paint over it with a simple testers silver.
 





daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
Kenom said:
yeah I was thinkin overkill myself with the antec stuff. That's why I recommended the clay. it's cheap and would be easy to remove if you ever needed to. You could also use JB weld it's grey but a little to dark. The neat thing is you can always paint over it with a simple testers silver.


I think that the JB is a great idea ;D

Thanks Kenom [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Imma hafta stop by Home Depot this afternoon now.

Peace,
dave
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
373
Points
18
I wish I had never seen this. Now I have to spend more money and build one for myself too haha. Good job guys!
 

Switch

0
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
3,327
Points
0
climbak said:
I wish I had never seen this. Now I have to spend more money and build one for myself too haha. Good job guys!

Eventually someone's gonna build a highpowered one and light 3 matches in a triangle at once. ;D
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
9,399
Points
113
My CO[sub]2[/sub] had an aiming system like that - three IIIa diodes strapped around the tube 120[sup]o[/sup] from each other wired in series with a switch and 9V wall transformer. I dismantled it in a failed attempt at an enclosure, but I'll definitely do it again this summer.
 

Ace82

0
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
1,768
Points
0
daguin said:
This just looked cool so I tried one.  I haven't figured out what I'm going to use to "fill in " the space around the modules yet.

Here's mine

Nice!  I'm glad to see others respecting my idea (although it really isn't mine :p).  You and I pretty much built our head exactly the same.  I cut a little circle from 2 Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup paper squares to separate the contacts from ground (+) and switched contact (-).  I simply put the 3 AAA holder in reverse to switch polarity.  I use hot glue to fill the gaps. Mine is still solid, and hasn't moved out of alignment yet (but then I haven't dropped it yet either).  

Looks good!  

It's a fun little project.  I really like the feel of the 3 parallel beams.
 
 

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
Ace82 said:
I use hot glue to fill the gaps. Mine is still solid

Yeah. I figured out that part of the problem was that I neglected to remove the "warning sticker" that the Sure modules have wrapped around them. The height of the stickers not only gave the modules a "pivot point", they are "slippery" as well. I finally compromised and set them to converge at about 36". That allows for a very gradual spread of the targeting pattern. If I do another one (or maybe more, Comic-Con is coming in July), they will be parallel.

And yes, the dots looks good moving in unison.

Peace,
dave
 
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
19
Points
0
Man this is really cool! Nice work.

This thread made me think of something. This might be too time consuming to consider, but if you could get multiple (3) burning lasers hooked up to a zoom scope with a crosshair that could automatically focus all the lasers onto one spot you would essentially have just one really awesome laser right? Just a thought...
 

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
current_affairs said:
Man this is really cool! Nice work.


I forgot to mention this last night. I think I forgot it because I forgot to get any pictures of it. However, when I was playing with my new fog machine, these three beams moving in unison looked really coooool :cool:

Peace,
dave
 
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
545
Points
0
current_affairs said:
Man this is really cool! Nice work.

This thread made me think of something. This might be too time consuming to consider, but if you could get multiple (3) burning lasers hooked up to a zoom scope with a crosshair that could automatically focus all the lasers onto one spot you would essentially have just one really awesome laser right? Just a thought...

yeah you're right... alot of time.

To focus three beams at the exact same point based on distance x, within a reasonable amount of time, would mean that you would have to simultaneously and congruently change the angle of the three housings in contrast to the imaginary central axis that lies between them. Meaning once you got it focused on something say... 10 ft away from you, and you wanted to put it on something 100ft away, you would have to restart the process of adjusting the angle of the three housings. Unless of coarse you had a complex housing with a lot of lenses and optics converging each beam into one.

:)
 
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
19
Points
0
TheGr8Revealing said:
[quote author=current_affairs link=1211822319/12#23 date=1212718707]Man this is really cool! Nice work.

This thread made me think of something. This might be too time consuming to consider, but if you could get multiple (3) burning lasers hooked up to a zoom scope with a crosshair that could automatically focus all the lasers onto one spot you would essentially have just one really awesome laser right? Just a thought...

yeah you're right... alot of time.

To focus three beams at the exact same point based on distance x, within a reasonable amount of time, would mean that you would have to simultaneously and congruently change the angle of the three housings in contrast to the imaginary central axis that lies between them. Meaning once you got it focused on something say... 10 ft away from you, and you wanted to put it on something 100ft away, you would have to restart the process of adjusting the angle of the three housings. Unless of coarse you had a complex housing with a lot of lenses and optics converging each beam into one.

:)[/quote]


You have a good point there. Rigging up the optics would be a lot easier than having to do vector calculus every time you want to point the thing in a different direction ;D. There are already a ton of optics in dvd burners anyway, I think it could be done... but I guess that belongs on another thread. Smart thinking, Gr8.
 
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
191
Points
0
Calculus? I really dont see what you mean reavealing. Assuming you rig up the three modules equidistant from the center, and are all evenly around the perimeter(1/3D between them) it would be easily possible. You would just have to find a convex lens that would fit and have the right focal length( just use lenz's law) so you could focus the three to a dot... Dont make me create a ray diagram  :p
 

Ace82

0
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
1,768
Points
0
If I were to use 3 burners it would probably just be for show, but much more brilliant! Or I might focus them all and burn three different spots! :p
 

Switch

0
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
3,327
Points
0
Maelstrom said:
Calculus? I really dont see what you mean reavealing. Assuming you rig up the three modules equidistant from the center, and are all evenly around the perimeter(1/3D between them) it would be easily possible. You would just have to find a convex lens that would fit and have the right focal length( just use lenz's law) so you could focus the three to a dot... Dont make me create a ray diagram  :p
You can't use a lens to intersect the beams.The lens will also make the individual beam converge/diverge. :p You could do this without "vector calculus" or actually combining beams, just a rig that once it's calibrated, you just have to turn a screw to adjust distance.
 

Attachments

  • co1.JPG
    co1.JPG
    14.8 KB · Views: 452
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
191
Points
0
Maelstrom said:
so you could focus the three to a dot...
Yup.  :p
I didnt quite read his post fully so I thought he meant just focusing to a point, not combining beams  ;)
EDIT: re read it... Im pretty sure he meant just a point... Btw nice diagrams :D
 




Top