Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

O-like mess

Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
371
Points
28
This is a short review of my recent experience with O-Like.

I know that most of you probably have good experience with O-Like. Hopefully this is an one time incident.

I am posting it because I am as of now without a laser and without a refund, and O-Like owe me about $270. And on top of this, their support ignore my messages on both MSN and e-mail. I have proof of returned laser by post tracking number.

If you don't care about reading a long post, summary goes:

O-Like refuses to respond to communication. They lie about packet delivery status. And they owe me a lot of money. On top of this they have cost me a LOT of money in return shipment. They have in total sent me 2 underspec lasers. And wasted over half a year of my time dealing with other things.

Concluded in

Got my refund at 2011-08-11. They do not refund any S&H, and their policy is to Not to refund any PayPal fees for the transaction.

I would not recommend ordering from them when we have new and fresh laser competition in town.

----------------

So....

I was looking for an awesome 532nm pen on a budget. As many probably are. Ran across their 350mW at $190-something? This host type laser. Including shipping it turned out $224.98.

At the time it was displayed as an IR filtered 350-400mW laser at $196.99. Ordered it the same day.

This was 2010-10-23. Just after it's launch.

It arrived 2011-11-02. I put it in the LPM first thing, and got quite disappointed.

Following was sent to o-like:

mhakali said:
Doing a beam expansion shows that the beam is not in TEM00. I have been cycling it for the recommended duty cycles for about 10 minutes of usage in total. And it jumps around like crazy between different transverse modes! Most of the times it sits in what looks like TEM03. :(

The power output peaks at over 390mW without any IR filtering. It however quickly becomes obvious that the output contains a lot of IR. With an IR filter it barely reaches 310mW, and stabilizes around 200mW (this is compared to 380mW without IR filter, almost 180mW IR!).

When I placed the order the following information was available at your product page:

"Output Power (IR filtered) 350-400mW"

It has since then changed to:

"Output Power >350mW"

I can understand your changing the specifications. But as you may understand I feel a bit disappointed in the performance of this pointer. Most especially due to the transverse mode.

Please get back to me on your thoughts about this.

I may just have received a bad unit?

310mW may seem like a good peak. But bear in mind that this was a one time peak. Mostly it was horribly unstable and the divergence was unacceptable (even after refocusing), especially at the transverse modes described.

Got a prompt reply:

O-Like said:
Yes ,it is really our mistake to write "IR filtered" ,
I wonder how much time do you test it ? our suggestion is 1 minute ,I can not believe it can drop 200mW within 1 minute .
Pls let me know more details . we checked carefully before shipped .
Change or refund are acceptable if you are not satisfied . we gurantee 100% satisfication .Don't worry

Replied:

mhakali said:
I will do some more in detailed tests today, and get back to you.

But first I will have to complete a working day.

But yes, I will most likely want to return the unit. Mostly because the beam does not stay in TEM00. Which for me is important.

I am considering returning and upgrading to http://www.o-like.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2&products_id=41

Is this possible? Is that model recommended? How can I expect power output from this one in comparacy?

The product above was the massive green 350mW at a slightly higher price. It is unfortunately not available anymore.

Got this very interesting response back. Full disclosure. Sorry O-like.

O-like said:
Pls first clarify our output power ,I can not believe it just 200mW after IR filter , members on LPF will be disappointed on this laser after your review
you'd better test it within 1 minute
.if it is 310mW after IR filter ,it is reliable.

Conducted further tests. Concluded the same. Very SMALL peaks at 270mW with IR-filter. Inserting additional IR-filter gave another 4% power loss (opposed to the almost 40% reduced by the first filter) showed an enormous amount of IR radiation.

On MSN we agreed on me sending it back ($40 shipping cost from Sweden, I had to pay for it in full). After the laser was returned we agreed on purchasing an IR filtered 350mW green laser with a steady duty time and huge heatsink, and I would put $75 extra to O-like. Done deal.

This was 2010-12-19.

It was one of these hosts. Looking at them it's probably the same c***p sent out from same distributor.

Received this one after christmas in January.

Testing it in the LPM I got a steady result, but nowhere near 350mW. O-Like had removed IR filter before shipping. Got same about 30% falloff with IR filter. And around 200mW steady output.

Requested remedy from O-Like via MSN. After a lot of argumentation and explanation to O-Like how IR filters operate and why the measurements were accurate (probably took me about one week) they agreed on taking it back.

Sending it back in February.

After about 3 months I got the packet returned to me. When checking the tracking number I could only see "Failed delivery". Noted that I *ALWAYS* copy/paste their addresses and print on a label putting on the packet. So if there was something wrong with the delivery address I did not cause it.

Receiver label was not damaged on packet on re-arrival here.

That's another $40 to waste...

Contacted O-Like again. This was in June. They had already forgotten all about my order of course. So had to start all over.

After a while we agreed on sending it back for full refund ($40 again...). I shipped it in July.

china post said:
RR169306328SE 2011 final delivery CHINA (PEOPLE'S REP.) 2011-07-20 *

RR169306328SE 2011 unsuccessful delivery CHINA (PEOPLE'S REP.) 2011-07-13

RR169306328SE 2011 departure from transit office of exchange SHENZHEN CHINA (PEOPLE'S REP.) 2011-07-12

I have above a confirmed signed delivery from O-Like.

Our last MSN dialog looked like:

(12:00:31 PM) Micke: Hello. I was just wondering if you have received my packet?
(12:00:53 PM) laser: what packet
(12:01:12 PM) Micke: I returned a laser to you according to your instructions for refund
(12:02:10 PM) Micke: I put a note inside with order number & instructions of refund
(12:02:19 PM) Micke: and the paypal confirmation numbers for payment
(12:04:54 PM) laser: we have not received it
(12:12:27 PM) Micke: Tracking number RR169306328SE
(12:13:02 PM) Micke: When I track it I can see the following:
(12:14:41 PM) Micke: 欢迎使用国际普邮跟踪查询��用户查询 <-- shows "Final delivery"!
(12:18:24 PM) Micke: Hello??
(12:26:32 PM) Micke: This is not entertaining. I am out a lot of money on this one. And now tracking info say it's delivered since 8 days back. And you claim it is not.
(12:37:47 PM) Micke: Hello..?
(12:45:45 PM) Micke: Hello?
(01:07:40 PM) Micke: Hello?
(07/29/2011 08:13:22 AM) Micke: Hello
(08:13:51 AM) Micke: Please look up my packet RR169306328SE according to intmail.183.com.cn it is DELIVERED to you. Please process my refund ASAP.

No response via E-mail either.

My faith in O-Like as a company has dropped significantly.

They owe me $196 + $75 in pure laser products (original laser + upgrade). They have cost me around $120 in return shipments. And now they lie about delivery status, and when proven wrong they are just silent.

Update 2011-08-03:

olike said:
Hello Mikael
Sorry for late reply ,I am on business trip now ,I will be at office two days later ,we will check the package and refund then

Thanks
Susie

May have some hope for resolution :)

2011-08-08 & 2011-08-09:

chatlog said:
(01:03:52 PM) Micke: Hello. I would like to know the status on the refund? You mailed me on 2011-08-03 saying you would look into it.
(01:04:13 PM) laser: yesM
(01:06:41 PM) Micke: what is my status?
(01:11:36 PM) laser: what is your name
(01:11:41 PM) Micke: ***********
(01:12:06 PM) laser: I will give you answer tomorrowM
(01:12:15 PM) laser: and give you refund tomorrowM
(01:12:21 PM) laser: we just begin to work todayM
(01:12:33 PM) Micke: OK. Thank you. That is fine.
(01:12:41 PM) Micke: Do you have all info you need?
(01:12:50 PM) laser: sorry for late actionM
(01:13:04 PM) laser: you can contact with me at the same timeM
(01:13:34 PM) Micke: I am not sure if I am available tomorrow. Therefore, please make sure you have all info you need, then mail or MSN me the result tomorrow?
(01:14:06 PM) Micke: So if you require any additional information from me right now, please make sure to ask it.
(01:14:11 PM) Micke: so that there's no further delays.
(01:18:52 PM) Micke: Can you please confirm?


(08/09/2011 01:26:53 PM) Micke: Hello
(01:26:59 PM) Micke: How has the status on my refund gone today?
(01:27:12 PM) laser: hiM
(01:27:30 PM) laser: we have received it yesterdayM
(01:28:09 PM) Micke: no, the receipt of delivery shows that it was delivered on the 20th of Juli
(01:29:29 PM) Micke: So, according to you you should have completed the refund by this time today.
(01:33:58 PM) Micke: hello..?
(01:45:05 PM) Micke: can you please respond?
(01:55:27 PM) Micke: hello..?

Same good response as always.. :shhh: :can:

2011-08-11

Got my refund of $299.98. First paypal subtracted $12 in PP fees, which they initially refused to replace. After pushing very hard for an explanation for how this could possibly be my problem them choosing to use PayPal I got an additional $12 refund.

They refuse to pay any of my $120 S&H cost. That's their policy.

They are also very suspicious why I have received two bad lasers when they apparently have very tight quality control.

This is after tons of measurement data & graphs etc have been delivered to them during all of this.

Peace :)
 
Last edited:





Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
3,220
Points
0
Nobody likes the chinese practice of exaggerating the specs of lasers but its unfortunaly a fact of life that no amount of bickering is going to change, and o-like in general is closer to what they claim than anyone else I know who competes in the budget price market.

I however have a challenge for you though. Find another company selling evening a 200mW guaranteed power, guaranteed TEM00 for 60+ seconds portable for the $250 price range.. I bet you can't and I bet the next cheapest price you can find on one is over double what these are.

The 445's have people spoiled. DPSS, done right, will always be expensive.

Yes it sucks that these in general aren't 300mW+ greens(there have been exceptions), however even at 200mW these are pretty much the only game in town for under $400.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
14,125
Points
113
Wow, that sucks.

My last experience with o-like also left me with a very sour taste, so while I agree with qumefox about them being the only cheap game in town, I can't wait for another company to show up.

That chat log is exactly what happened to me. I was doing other stuff very late into the night so messaged every few minutes... after two hours they replied "i look into it" and signed off:undecided:

I hope you insured the package... that was the only thing that did get a response.
 

DJNY

0
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
5,991
Points
83
Read about more and more bad experiences during the past weeks..

Hope they at least send you back the refund for the unit!!

CNI, LG and JETLASERS are the only companies I trust these days...
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
3,220
Points
0
I doubt there will be another company showing up. Not that can make reliable high power AND good beam specs at the same time in the same laser, and keep it cheap. When you get over 100mW or so, your well beyond 'just sticking a couple of crystals in front of an 808nm diode' and getting green out territory. High power DPSS generally take some actual skill, education, patients, and probably more than a little luck, to get both good power and good beam quality. You have things like thermal lensing in the lasing and doubling materials, cavity optimization, etc to deal with.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
14,125
Points
113
^^^I hear you. I'm being cautiously optimistic about lazerer.com....

I'm really not sure wtf is going on with o-like, and rayfoss. At one point both companies had good reputations, but now I'm coming across problems with them almost every day. That rhd is having trouble with DL is beyond ridiculous, they were also a go to company.

Aside from the companies DJNY listed the only one I'd add to the list (have yet to come across anything bad) is optotronics.
 

Jaxz

0
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Messages
244
Points
18
This is a short review of my recent experience with O-Like.

I know that most of you probably have good experience with O-Like. Hopefully this is an one time incident.

I am posting it because I am as of now without a laser and without a refund, and O-Like owe me about $270. And on top of this, their support ignore my messages on both MSN and e-mail. I have proof of returned laser by post tracking number.

If you don't care about reading a long post, summary goes:

O-Like refuses to respond to communication. They lie about packet delivery status. And they owe me a lot of money. On top of this they have cost me a LOT of money in return shipment. They have in total sent me 2 underspec lasers. And wasted over half a year of my time dealing with other things.


----------------

So....

I was looking for an awesome 532nm pen on a budget. As many probably are. Ran across their 350mW at $190-something? This host type laser. Including shipping it turned out $224.98.

At the time it was displayed as an IR filtered 350-400mW laser at $196.99. Ordered it the same day.

This was 2010-10-23. Just after it's launch.

It arrived 2011-11-02. I put it in the LPM first thing, and got quite disappointed.

Following was sent to o-like:



310mW may seem like a good peak. But bear in mind that this was a one time peak. Mostly it was horribly unstable and the divergence was unacceptable (even after refocusing), especially at the transverse modes described.

Got a prompt reply:



Replied:



The product above was the massive green 350mW at a slightly higher price. It is unfortunately not available anymore.

Got this very interesting response back. Full disclosure. Sorry O-like.



Conducted further tests. Concluded the same. Very SMALL peaks at 270mW with IR-filter. Inserting additional IR-filter gave another 4% power loss (opposed to the almost 40% reduced by the first filter) showed an enormous amount of IR radiation.

On MSN we agreed on me sending it back ($40 shipping cost from Sweden, I had to pay for it in full). After the laser was returned we agreed on purchasing an IR filtered 350mW green laser with a steady duty time and huge heatsink, and I would put $75 extra to O-like. Done deal.

This was 2010-12-19.

It was one of these hosts. Looking at them it's probably the same c***p sent out from same distributor.

Received this one after christmas in January.

Testing it in the LPM I got a steady result, but nowhere near 350mW. O-Like had removed IR filter before shipping. Got same about 30% falloff with IR filter. And around 200mW steady output.

Requested remedy from O-Like via MSN. After a lot of argumentation and explanation to O-Like how IR filters operate and why the measurements were accurate (probably took me about one week) they agreed on taking it back.

Sending it back in February.

After about 3 months I got the packet returned to me. When checking the tracking number I could only see "Failed delivery". Noted that I *ALWAYS* copy/paste their addresses and print on a label putting on the packet. So if there was something wrong with the delivery address I did not cause it.

Receiver label was not damaged on packet on re-arrival here.

That's another $40 to waste...

Contacted O-Like again. This was in June. They had already forgotten all about my order of course. So had to start all over.

After a while we agreed on sending it back for full refund ($40 again...). I shipped it in July.



I have above a confirmed signed delivery from O-Like.

Our last MSN dialog looked like:



No response via E-mail either.

My faith in O-Like as a company has dropped significantly.

They owe me $196 + $75 in pure laser products (original laser + upgrade). They have cost me around $120 in return shipments. And now they lie about delivery status, and when proven wrong they are just silent.
Looks like this is not the first time O-like make mistakes on the status on the IR filters on their greens. Way back last year the same thing happen to me and they claimed it is a typo error on their website. Therefore I asked for refund for the unit I bought which they had refund in total. I assume they should not repeat this mistake again but looks like this is disappointing. This is not ethical to continue claiming that their greens are IR filter while it is not, it is deceiving the customers. How many of us here own LPMs and IR Filters? If the customer don't owned one, then will it be a quick pull off and quick money down their pockets? I am starting to lose respect for this company and I will not entertain their products anymore.

So far, I only trust Jetlasers now, though their units may be more expensive, but since it is made of titanium, I didn't mind.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
3,220
Points
0
You have to remember that o-like and rayfoss aren't manufacturers. They're still resellers, only just more specialized resellers than say dinodirect or DX.

CNI and jetlasers are manufacturers. LG is a CNI reseller with really high QC standards, but you also pay for that with them too.

I imagine all these problems probably stem from the same root cause.. Crappy economies pretty much everywhere on the planet.

My guess is sales are down with DL, o-like, rayfoss etc to the point it starts denting them in the wallet to fix 'minor' problems. Though, in cases like DL, the behavior only ended up costing them more business (and the problem wasn't minor either. The laser was grossly underspec by >50%). I don't think many who read rhd's thread dealing with them will ever give them any business again.
 

Jaxz

0
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Messages
244
Points
18
I see. that's don't sound good on their business. As for DL, I already stopped giving them business due to some issues with them in the past.
 

joeyss

2
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
1,112
Points
0
Honestly after having 2 bad lasers from olike reading this thread just makes me want only buy from members who know what they're building from now on.
 

DJNY

0
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
5,991
Points
83
LAZERER might be our new source for cheap lasers with a power guarantee.

They are also good to communicate.

Of course it is going to be a long hard way for them till they are able to establish and many people recommending them like we did with O-Like, Rayfoss before - but I´m confident!


Sorry for the little off-topic, but thought this is the time to think outside the box when purchasing a cheap (non CNI / JET / VIASHO) company laser.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
10
Points
0
...Now you all have me worred i just ordered a laser from olike 5 days ago and it still hasnt shipped... i have no idea what to do
 

DJNY

0
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
5,991
Points
83
...Now you all have me worred i just ordered a laser from olike 5 days ago and it still hasnt shipped... i have no idea what to do

Sit back relax and let yourself go.

They aren´t bad overall, only more bad experiences in the past.

Your chance that you get what your ordered is >95%

If your ordered a 650nm or 405nm laser it will also be up to spec and won´t have any beam problems.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
100
Points
0
Jeez, i just received tracking for my o-like 400 today, after reading this i hope to god i don't have these issues :(
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
371
Points
28
Heya guys. Thanks for all the replies & support! Will update the thread accordingly if something evolves.

Replies to a select:

What a fiasco o_O I hope it gets worked out! Sue their asses! XD

Heh, doubtfully even paypal will take up a transaction dispute this long after purchase :)

I'm in the good graces of the Chinese right now.


InfinitusEquitas said:
My last experience with o-like also left me with a very sour taste, so while I agree with qumefox about them being the only cheap game in town, I can't wait for another company to show up.

I am starting to like what I see at Lazerer. But yeah, probably same ball park.

InfinitusEquitas said:
I hope you insured the package... that was the only thing that did get a response.

My postal service will not refund delivered packets. And all records shows a successful delivery. They may refund up to around 60 EUR for broken items to the recipient (on the standard service). Which I am not in this case.

DJNY said:
Hope they at least send you back the refund for the unit!!

Thanks mate :) I just sent em another mail.

FRag1304 said:
...Now you all have me worred i just ordered a laser from olike 5 days ago and it still hasnt shipped... i have no idea what to do

Sit back. You will get a laser. Never heard of a member not receiving goods. If you are then dissatisfied, take necessary steps then. Don't worry :)

Paul0759 said:
Jeez, i just received tracking for my o-like 400 today, after reading this i hope to god i don't have these issues

I am sure your unit will be fine. They have also been on the market longer. Had time to fix initial problems with this make (which was absolutely sparkling new on the date of my order).
 




Top