zyxwv99
0
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 178
- Points
- 0
I'm definitely going to want a monrochomator or a spectroscope, preferably something very inexpensive. A laser may have a narrow bandwidth, but you can never be sure where the peak is, and it usually has a long, dirty tail. If a portion of the tail is at a wavelength to which our eyes are far more sensitive than the peak, then we may mistake the tail for the dog.
By the way, pages 93-94 of this book (below), especially the chart at the top of page 94, is pretty interesting. It says that above 600nm the sensitivity of the blue-cone is so weak that our vision is essentially dichromatic, i.e., red-green. However, since red and green sensitivity taper off at different rates, there are places where we see the exact same color at two different wavelengths. For example, 800nm looks exactly the same as 663nm, since at both wavelengths the R/G ratio is 12. (That might explain why my 808nm laser pointer looks like what I imagine 670nm ought to look like.)
Color Vision: From Genes to Perception - Google Books
By the way, pages 93-94 of this book (below), especially the chart at the top of page 94, is pretty interesting. It says that above 600nm the sensitivity of the blue-cone is so weak that our vision is essentially dichromatic, i.e., red-green. However, since red and green sensitivity taper off at different rates, there are places where we see the exact same color at two different wavelengths. For example, 800nm looks exactly the same as 663nm, since at both wavelengths the R/G ratio is 12. (That might explain why my 808nm laser pointer looks like what I imagine 670nm ought to look like.)
Color Vision: From Genes to Perception - Google Books