rhd
0
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 8,469
- Points
- 0
I've been wanting to do a comparison of my diode blue builds for a while. I was hoping the 4-laser shot would turn out a bit better, but it's a start, I may try again in the future. Practically speaking, my 495 is such a low power build that it would be near impossible to get it to show up when next to the others. It was hard enough to position them all at the correct distance from my spectrometer fibre so that I could catch them all on one reading:
Picture from left to right. These are completely un-retouched photos.
449nm @ 2.5 W (typical 9mm multi mode)
460nm @ 4.5 W (Nichia array extracted diode, possibly closer to 465nm by time of photo)
478nm @ 800 mW ("edge-driven" 462)
495nm @ 10 mW (single mode)
Here's a slightly better shot, taken in RAW. However, there's no getting around the fact that the camera sees the 449nm and 406nm almost the same way. The dramatic difference (in person and on film) is the jump to 478nm:
Here's an unretouched photo of the 449nm (typical 9mm multimode) next to the 478nm ("edge-driven" 462):
And a solo of the 495nm (in a beautiful eghemus host):
Picture from left to right. These are completely un-retouched photos.
449nm @ 2.5 W (typical 9mm multi mode)
460nm @ 4.5 W (Nichia array extracted diode, possibly closer to 465nm by time of photo)
478nm @ 800 mW ("edge-driven" 462)
495nm @ 10 mW (single mode)
Here's a slightly better shot, taken in RAW. However, there's no getting around the fact that the camera sees the 449nm and 406nm almost the same way. The dramatic difference (in person and on film) is the jump to 478nm:
Here's an unretouched photo of the 449nm (typical 9mm multimode) next to the 478nm ("edge-driven" 462):
And a solo of the 495nm (in a beautiful eghemus host):
Attachments
Last edited: