589nm vs. 593.5nm Pointers?

• Jan 28, 2016

• #1

NightExplorer96

0

Joined

Sep 5, 2013

Messages

8,549

Points

113

Well.....

I love going back reading these kinds of threads over LPF when I get bored and the fact I'll be back in the zone ordering a 405nm pointer from Laserglow tomorrow early morning made me want to start this thread

How come 593.5nm pointers are so much rarer then 589nm pointers? Is it due to popularity? price? newer technology? visibility? color(although it's a very small difference)?

I mean, we see tons of 589nm pointers(ok, maybe not tons) but many people have 589nm in their collection, whereas 593.5nm is still quite rare :undecided:

Discuss

Also, which would you rather have? I personally, would rather have the good'ol Rigel

-Alex

 

• Jan 28, 2016

• #2

L

Laser Chick

0

Joined

Jan 26, 2015

Messages

1,222

Points

63

593.5nm all the way as my favorite color is orange and this was very close. IMHO it is not yellow but an amber/orange color. Some cameras see it as almost a pure yellow though.

 

• Jan 28, 2016

• #3

NightExplorer96

0

Joined

Sep 5, 2013

Messages

8,549

Points

113

Laser Chick said:

593.5nm all the way as my favorite color is orange and this was very close. IMHO it is not yellow but an amber/orange color. Some cameras see it as almost a pure yellow though.

Click to expand...

Indeed! 593.5nm is such a nice, calming color

-Alex

 

• Jan 28, 2016

• #4

Isaac Clarke

0

Joined

Feb 26, 2015

Messages

1,359

Points

0

maybe because 593.5nm are very inefficient compare to 589nm..... cost more to produces+less profit margin.... And as we all know Companies prioritize profit before any other factors...

 

• Jan 28, 2016

• #5

NightExplorer96

0

Joined

Sep 5, 2013

Messages

8,549

Points

113

FUBeaches said:

maybe because 593.5nm are very inefficient compare to 589nm..... cost more to produces+less profit margin.... And as we all know Companies prioritize profit before any other factors...

Click to expand...

Good point! :yh:

Edit: 593.5nm pointers are cheaper at lower levels actually.

-Alex

 

Last edited: Jan 28, 2016

• Jan 28, 2016

• #6

Gabe

0

Joined

Jan 10, 2015

Messages

1,147

Points

83

589 is just easier to produce, slightly higher visibility, more stable, and available in higher powers. Or so I'm told.
EDIT: but 593.5 is such a nice colour tho...

 

Last edited: Jan 28, 2016

• Jan 28, 2016

• #7

diachi

0

Joined

Feb 22, 2008

Messages

9,700

Points

113

Is there a noticeable difference in colour between 589nm and 593.5nm?

 

• Jan 28, 2016

• #8

Gabe

0

Joined

Jan 10, 2015

Messages

1,147

Points

83

diachi said:

Is there a noticeable difference in colour between 589nm and 593.5nm?

Click to expand...

From what I've heard, yes.

 

• Jan 28, 2016

• #9

brucemir

0

Joined

Aug 3, 2012

Messages

1,209

Points

113

This is a fairly accurate photo of a Dragon Laser 589nm 50mw and a CNI PGL 30mw

 

Last edited: Jan 28, 2016

• Jan 29, 2016

• #10

NightExplorer96

0

Joined

Sep 5, 2013

Messages

8,549

Points

113

Ugh.....

Such nice pictures bruce! I'm starting to think 589nm might be better for completing a rainbow since it's more on the yellow side of things unlike 593.5?

Keep this going

-Alex

 

• Jan 29, 2016

• #11

L

Laser Chick

0

Joined

Jan 26, 2015

Messages

1,222

Points

63

Yes there is a noticeable difference even though there is just a 4.5nm difference between the two.

 

• Jan 29, 2016

• #12

LtKernelPanic

0

Joined

Sep 22, 2010

Messages

1,358

Points

48

diachi said:

Is there a noticeable difference in colour between 589nm and 593.5nm?

Click to expand...

For only 4nm there is quite a bit of a difference.

Left is a 594 HeNe which is identical (to my eye at least) to 593.5 and right id 589. It's a bit over exposed but the colors are pretty close to spot on.

2013-10-04_09-58-43pm by
ltkernelpanic, on Flickr


593.5/594 is an amber color since it's getting into the orange wavelengths where 589 is pretty much a golden yellow.

 

Last edited: Jan 29, 2016

• Jan 29, 2016

• #13

Gabe

0

Joined

Jan 10, 2015

Messages

1,147

Points

83

Is 589 really that yellow? I have a 593.5 as well and the colour for that one is spot on. But I never remembered 589 being that yellow

 

• Jan 29, 2016

• #14

Pman

0

Joined

Nov 28, 2012

Messages

4,447

Points

113

593.4 because I already have a 589
I showed 3 people my 589nm at the same time awhile back and the answers for what color it was was never straight yellow. It was yellow/orange, orange, golden or golden orange. It can make a difference when you change the background or of course having another wavelength next to it or particles in the air. Especially nice when a beam has that "shimmery" look like it's sparkling everywhere.

 

• Jan 29, 2016

• #15

diachi

0

Joined

Feb 22, 2008

Messages

9,700

Points

113

Huh, TIL. Wouldn't have thought there would be that much of a difference, cool!

@Pman: That "shimmery" look is my favourite - for any wavelength.

 

• Jan 30, 2016

• #16

Lux Nitida

0

Joined

Jul 9, 2015

Messages

248

Points

43

Gabe said:

Is 589 really that yellow? I have a 593.5 as well and the colour for that one is spot on. But I never remembered 589 being that yellow

Click to expand...

589nm is a real oddball wavelength for me to photograph and have come out accurate. By itself works pretty well:

Or this view:

But as soon as I added other wavelengths with it, I was amazed how orange it now looks in my photos:

To me the closest pictures I have to what it looks like to my eye is the top one and the crystal photo. I feel it is a golden yellow, if I lase a white wall with ambient light present, to my eye it is a beautiful golden yellow.

 

Last edited: Jan 30, 2016