Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Buying: Beam Dump

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
I've come to the conclusion that I need a beam dump, a la this one. Do any of you have a beam dump around that you want to sell or the ability to machine one and anodize it black or put a durable matte black coating on?

Tall order I know, but with the people around here, it's worth a shot. :)

-Trevor
 
Last edited:





daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
That's the one I have. It is invaluable. Good decision

Peace,
dave
 

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
That's the one I have. It is invaluable. Good decision

Peace,
dave

1.5W is hard on just about anything I put it on. ><

Edited the first post - I don't have my heart set on that one, I just need a beam dump.

:thanks:

-Trevor
 

ZRTMWA

0
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
1,312
Points
0
You could try to use two cinder blocks. Lay one down flat in front of one behind it on its side. Spray paint the whole contraption black with high heat paint (i.e. engine enamel, stove paint) so the paint won't burn off when you use higher powered lasers.

These are all my own musings and there is no guarantee that these methods will work but they will sure save you a heck of a lot of money lol.
 

aXit

0
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
206
Points
0
Plenty of people with lathes around that could do it.

You could anodise it yourself, lots of guides around, including a nice one over on PL.
 

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
Plenty of people with lathes around that could do it.

You could anodise it yourself, lots of guides around, including a nice one over on PL.

You're gonna want the interior to be non-reflective. I believe that an anodized surface will still give you too much "back splash."

Peace,
dave
 

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
You're gonna want the interior to be non-reflective. I believe that an anodized surface will still give you too much "back splash."

Peace,
dave

I figured if the inside of the dump is properly shaped, the anodized surface will still reflect less than just having the beam terminate on a black object (which is my currently lame system ><). I guess I'd have to experiment.

-Trevor
 

HIMNL9

0
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
5,318
Points
0
I figured if the inside of the dump is properly shaped, the anodized surface will still reflect less than just having the beam terminate on a black object (which is my currently lame system ><). I guess I'd have to experiment.

-Trevor

Yes, usually the internal shape is designed for minimize te possible reflection to the output, or at least, for make the beams bounce so much in the inside, before become reflected again to the output, that the more possible energy is adsorbed from the black matte surface and converted in heat ..... like in this way:

attachment.php


Considering that the internal surface is usually sandblasted and then anodized opaque, it can have an absorption capacity of 95% or more, and that a beam correctly pointed can bounce inside 6 to 9 times, before re-bounce to the exit .....

As example, considering a 10W beam that bounce also just 4 times, loosing 95% of its energy in each bounce ..... 10-95%=0.5 > 0.5-95%=0.025 > 0.025-95%=0.00125 > 0.00125-95%=0.0000625 ..... when it come out again, it's a halo of 6.25 microwatt (a halo, not a beam, cause the inside surfaces are matte, not speculars) ..... safe enough, imho :p ;)
 

Attachments

  • beamdump.jpg
    beamdump.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 2,709

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
Yes, usually the internal shape is designed for minimize te possible reflection to the output, or at least, for make the beams bounce so much in the inside, before become reflected again to the output, that the more possible energy is adsorbed from the black matte surface and converted in heat ..... like in this way:

attachment.php


Considering that the internal surface is usually sandblasted and then anodized opaque, it can have an absorption capacity of 95% or more, and that a beam correctly pointed can bounce inside 6 to 9 times, before re-bounce to the exit .....

As example, considering a 10W beam that bounce also just 4 times, loosing 95% of its energy in each bounce ..... 10-95%=0.5 > 0.5-95%=0.025 > 0.025-95%=0.00125 > 0.00125-95%=0.0000625 ..... when it come out again, it's a halo of 6.25 microwatt (a halo, not a beam, cause the inside surfaces are matte, not speculars) ..... safe enough, imho :p ;)

I didn't think about sand blasting. I thought it was a different kind of coating inside. Maybe I'll go touch it ;)

Peace,
dave
 

HIMNL9

0
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
5,318
Points
0
I didn't think about sand blasting. I thought it was a different kind of coating inside. Maybe I'll go touch it ;)

Peace,
dave

It can also be, depend from the manufacturers ..... i had one times ago that was made in that way (sandblasted and anodized opaque black), but surely it's not the only way for make a low reflective surface ;)

That what left me perplexed, instead, is the flat aluminium colored ring around the aperture of the one linked ..... not the better thing to place around an aperture where you are supposed to shine a high powered laser beam, just in case that the beam gets misaligned and hit it, imho ..... :thinking:
 
Last edited:

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
I didn't think about sand blasting. I thought it was a different kind of coating inside. Maybe I'll go touch it ;)

Peace,
dave

Since I've had no bites on this, how's the coating in yours? Durable? Had any problems with it so far?

I was also considering this one...

-Trevor
 

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
Since I've had no bites on this, how's the coating in yours? Durable? Had any problems with it so far?

I was also considering this one...

-Trevor

I never got around to actually touching it. I'm pretty good about not touching where my fingers don't belong so it slipped my mind ;) A leftover from my days in construction, I think. I'll try to remember to touch it when I get home later today. Mine has been hit with 600mW of green, 1W of violet, and 800mw of IR without any problems.

Peace,
dave
 

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
I never got around to actually touching it. I'm pretty good about not touching where my fingers don't belong so it slipped my mind ;) A leftover from my days in construction, I think. I'll try to remember to touch it when I get home later today. Mine has been hit with 600mW of green, 1W of violet, and 800mw of IR without any problems.

Peace,
dave

Erm, if I were you I probably wouldn't. On the site the coating looks 'dusty,' that's more what I'm interested in. I'm very seriously considering springing for the Melles-Griot one...

-Trevor
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
1,076
Points
0
Best way to make a cheap beam dump is to use a stack of 30-40 razor blades. If you stack them flat against each other, the angle on the cutting edges will infinitely reflect the beam back inside. I have made several like this and they work well. There is also no coating to damage, so the only failure mode is melting.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17,622
Points
113
Hmmmm... gonna need to try that...
The only problem I can see is inadvertently cutting yourself..
Maybe install them in a shroud..:cool:

Jerry
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
1,076
Points
0
Hmmmm... gonna need to try that...
The only problem I can see is inadvertently cutting yourself..
Maybe install them in a shroud..:cool:

Jerry

It is actually hard to cut yourself with it when it is all done. You can rub your finger along the edges and it doesn't cut because the pressure is distributed across many blades. I wouldn't recommend trying to do that though.
 




Top