Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Power Meter Calibration and Comparison

hydro

0
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
114
Points
0
Kenom,

May suggest a new shipping order, I think this is the fasest way to get the laser around.

Kenom MT
Pseudonomoen137 TX
Daguin So CA
Scopeyguy So CA
Hydro So CA
Pullbangdead So CA
Jayrob N CA
DanQ N Ca
GooeyGus WA
rkcstr OH
Dr. Lava OH

Europe
Happytomato UK
ZomB Netherland
Igort EU

Let me know what you think. If you look at the map this will give the shortest down time (shipping).

Thanks
 





IgorT

0
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
4,177
Points
0
UK customs might also be less restrictive, than Netherlands.. The sender (DrLava) will just have to make sure to declare it as a low value item.
 

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
drlava said:
hmm, so my shipping bill will be for international? :O


The person being shipped TO is supposed to pay the shipping. You should pay Rkcstr for shipping from Toledo. HappyTomato should pay you for shipping it to the UK.

Peace,
dave
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
The lazors is on it's way to pseudo. Sent priority insured for $200
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
Priority to TX, with $200 insurance was $9.80

See attached receipt.
this did NOT need to go out priority. it could have gone by parcel post for $6.13 instead of $7.20
 

Attachments

  • receipt.jpg
    receipt.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 58

Zom-B

0
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
895
Points
28
I think it is high time for another update on long term laser stability. I've been running and measuring my stable long open can laser for two weeks now (306+ hours) and it still does not lead to a definite conclusion. It does reveal however, that the laser is very dependent on temperature (1mW per 2°F) and taking that into account, it also looks like the laser increased in power with an inverse exponential curve, stabilizing for 90% after the first 24hr, and only having increased less than 1mW in total (if at all).


Long-termlaserstability-1.png
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
Yeah but it's not that conclusive considering you have power readings in the same temperature range that vary by 1-3mw. You could stabalize the temperature in a closed enclosure, but I don't know if that would even solve the problem. Still all things considered you have a pretty stable laser there. I'd be willling to bet if you were to throw it on a tec, with a really large heatsink, you'd probably notice a nice stable laser.
 

jayrob

0
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
9,862
Points
113
Not sure if I should even include blu-ray readings from my LPM-1. (well, I guess it couldn't hurt)

I say this, because I have been doing comparisons with my LPM-1 vs my Coherent PM5200, and I am getting some inconsistent numbers??

I have noticed that for reds, and also for my RPL 473nm laser, that the LPM-1 is very close to my PM5200 (PM3 sensor).

But when comparing blu-ray measurements (using a multiplier with the 473nm setting), the multiplier does not hold true for different powers. Example:

On two different blu-ray lasers, using the Coherent thermal meter, I got 101mW's on one laser, and 138mW's on the other. So I found the multiplier for the 101mW laser was 2.62 for my LPM-1 on the 473nm ND filter reading.

Now, I thought that I would be able to use the same multiplier to see if it translates out to the correct reading of the second laser...

But no! In order to get to 138mW's, I had to change the multiplier to 2.49??

This is puzzling. :-?

So (looking for input), I'm guessing that if anything is out of spec., it is most likely the LPM-1, because it was not designed for 405nm. But the PM3 sensor is...
Jay
 

Zom-B

0
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
895
Points
28
Try with the attenuator on the LPM-1 if you did not do so already, and see if the multipliers match up then.

Or contact drlava, he worked with the designer of the LPM-1

[edit]hmm according to this graph at http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/showthread.php?p=19279 it seems to start saturating beyond 100mw, and I don't know the aperture size but if it is significantly larger than your beam diameter, then it might be that it is saturating locally, even though less than 100mW reaches the sensor. Try increasing the spot on the sensor and try again if the multipliers match.
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
Pseudo should have the calibration lasers on monday or tuesday at the latest. We should see pretty quickly how accurate my meters are.
 

Zom-B

0
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
895
Points
28
Everyone could enter his complete address in the spreadsheet onthe routing tab so there will be no uncertainties where people live.
 




Top